Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
比较套路的电影，可是最后Ruby用手语演唱给家人“听”，还是感动得不行。聋哑人的生存难度远比常人困难得多，愿世界给他们更多关怀。
虽然有些瑕疵，但是小姑娘的歌声还是蛮感人的，笑点也不少，三星半吧
两段演唱，第一段演出时父母视角的无声，第二段考试时突然的向父母比手语，前者是最简单粗暴的共情手法带来的直抵心底的恍然，后者就齁嗓子鸡汤了。中间还有一次是父亲摸着她的喉咙震动听唱，是刚好，不那么震慑，温柔的感动。总的来说女孩的成长里，虽然辛苦奔波，但几乎一切顺遂：全聋哑家庭里唯一一个健听女孩、歌唱天赋、伯乐老师、初恋男孩，可以说是幸运星附体了，唯一的矛盾是与没有听觉的父母、哥哥之间的天然屏障，哥哥更多一层，这样的妹妹到来之前一切如常，但妹妹的幸运让他看起来像是个没用的倒霉蛋，哦确实，挺惨的，但大爱包小恨，合家欢大团圆，令人欣慰。视听上也是舒服的，自然的拍摄手法、各种层次的演唱、手语等等给视觉加分的肢体表演，最后在考场上甚至跳起了手语舞，顺畅的好看，主旋律鸡汤好听又好看，就说它不得奖谁得奖！
观影时几度落泪。「你跟我不一样，你勇敢多了。」沉默的争执和和解，用手语唱出对家人的爱。
所以爱存在于第五维度，能跨越语言、声音和一切。
她和家人一样，都很难离开彼此；她有天赋，但如果没有家人，她也很难表现出来。离开，能成就更好的彼此。
好看！！ 热评有一个说是佳片有约会播放的电影，怎么这么阴阳怪气呢？看个电影还看出优越感来了，可笑！ 什么时候这种简单叙事，工整的电影也被人诟病了？ 有那么多奇奇怪怪的电影，赶紧去看别的电影吧你！
这不就是《贝利叶一家》🐴?
美国独立制作卷土重来。梦想与现实的俗套题材碰上了听障残疾群体，大大超越了原本的励志意味。透过女主角这个联系弱势群体与正常社会的纽带角色，一边展示出听障人士的生存困境，一边暗示了亲情羁绊的重要性。剧本不回避对人性自私的刻画，反而令人物更显真实，更凸显亲情的宝贵。好几幕利用声音的情节（父母出席音乐会时消音、父亲摸着女儿声带听唱歌、女儿边打手语边唱歌）犹如神来之笔，催泪效果十足。
很欣喜再次看到如此真实克制又令人感动的美国文艺片了。在好莱坞疯狂拿着“同性”“族裔”“移民”这些可争奖的政治正确标签而设计电影的当下，本片完全抛开这些金砖，选择在“少数群体”中深耕，找到了我们平时最容易见到又最容易忽视的群体——聋哑人，认真还原了聋哑家庭的真实生活状态，主线是女主要追求自己的梦想考伯克利，副线是女孩和男生的爱情线。主线在“个人和家庭选哪个”中进退两难，副线在“取笑我家庭的男孩到底该不该爱”中纠结。虽然猜到最终女主肯定会考上伯克利，也料到会用手语来演唱，可真当看到女主用手语演唱时，眼泪还是控制不住的流下来。也许正是这种真实和真诚，才让任何修饰和技巧显得多余。这才是我们平凡人的生活和情感啊，世界都大同，人间同艰难。只有一家人团结一心，乐观迎难，这世上还有什么困难？
奥斯卡最佳影片，苹果公关成功，翻拍同名电影没想到竟然战胜了大热的《犬山记》。
看的时候就在想，导演能不能有一个镜头展示一下从女主一家人视角的世界是什么样子的？果然在影片后半段出现了这一幕，他们看到的世界是全场静默，他们听不到女儿那美丽的歌声，只看到了观众们都在鼓掌，凭这一个镜头，值得给五星，但除此之外，本片太过于工整了......额，这倒不是电影的问题，可能是我的问题，我个人越来越对这类过于工整和精确拿捏大众情绪的影片，没有那么强烈的喜爱感了吧。
最有感觉的是ruby在车背后给老爸唱歌的那段 老爸摸着她震动的喉咙 我眼泪刷就下来了
感觉是意外还可以的翻拍，虽然也有美式高中生活的俗套但不算很做作。主要是对聋哑家庭的生活状态表现还不错。
温情脉脉，有《阳光小美女》《奇迹男孩》之风但差于前者，音乐好听、好几段处理得很漂亮，但结尾实在梦幻般地圆满就如同全片的基调一样，贴近生活的故事却无甚烟火气，是为一憾。 盲猜应该是今年颁奖礼最大的赢家。
虽然伯克利不是光听一首歌就能考上，但Both sides now确实很感人，听到眼睛湿了。
在学校音乐会上静音的那一会儿，我深刻认识无声世界还是挺可怕的。#20220220
这是那种，你知道它有哪些地方做得不错，也会有不少人深受感动，但你仍然觉得平庸，并且很快就把它遗忘的电影。唯一触动到的一场戏是父亲摸着女儿的脖子“听”她唱歌。
看到最后有些泪目了，没有啥花里胡哨的元素，不矫情不做作，通俗却不流俗，就是很诚挚的讲好一个故事，然后感动观众，有点找回了最初看电影的感觉，真好。夜空下与面试时，被深深打动。有笑有泪，家庭和梦想间的矛盾成全，彼此都需要放手。有点想到了凤凰河主演的《不设限通缉》。这样一个亲民温馨的故事，相信很少会有人不喜欢。
剧本写得扎实（也可以说套路吧）每一步都不出意料，但还是会看到眼眶微微湿润。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
